On Feb 20, 2012, at 6:29 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > On 2/20/12 5:15 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >> >>> On another note, have we decided on a standard process for committing to >>> trunk? >> Well for lower risk smaller changes I'm all for CTR, for larger higher risk >> changes RTC may be more suitable. I'm sure anyone who's a committers can use >> their judgment on a case by case basis? > I think the committers should use CTR. And you can always ask for a review > up front based on your judgement. Folks who aren't committers will submit > patches and find a way to get them reviewed by a committer.
This makes sense. I mean we have a repo. If someone makes a commit boo-boo we can always revert need be. So cool, thanks Alex.
