On Feb 20, 2012 7:08 AM, "David Arno" <da...@davidarno.org> wrote: > > > From: niel.drumm...@googlemail.com [mailto:niel.drumm...@googlemail.com] > On Behalf Of Niel Drummond > > Sent: 20 February 2012 07:45 > > > > 1) Wait for falcon, projected stable release late 2012, early 2013. > This to my mind is the most risky of your three options. We wait a year, > then maybe get a compiler, which will be of unknown quality and usability. > Then we'd have to start work on getting it to support MXML properly. > Just wanted to point out here that according to Gordon Smith, I believe, the statement that we would have to deal with MXML in the compiler post donation is incorrect as they already have built support for MXML with a different approach than what we have in mxmlc. Im not saying its either the right approach or 100% complete, just that it exists according to Adobe folk.
-- Omar Gonzalez s9tpep...@apache.org
