>I believe Gordon Smith said in one of the email threads that the new compiler 
>is no longer generating ActionScript 3 from the MXML files but converting 
>directly to bytecode. I would imagine this is the preferred >approach, no? I 
>haven't done any compiler dev myself, yet... but I'm eager to learn.

IMO, no. I think, although the structure was wrong, the approach taken in the 
Flex 3.x timeline where MXML was nothing but a set of descriptors was much 
better.

I like to think of MXML as declarative configuration for my project's views.

Mike

Reply via email to