2012/2/17 Jun Heider <j...@realeyes.com>: > > On Feb 16, 2012, at 12:39 AM, Omar Gonzalez wrote: > >> I'm not really seeing any opposition to FlexUnit and Mockolate as the unit >> testing and mocking libraries we should adopt. Unless I get some objections >> before EOD tomorrow I'm going to assume we've reached a consensus on this >> and add some verbiage to the project site to communicate which libraries >> we'll be working with for unit testing the framework. >> >> -- >> Omar Gonzalez >> s9tpep...@apache.org > > Hi Omar, sorry for the late response. In addition to this post I also saw > some conversation on some commits from you regarding this verbiage. > > Two reasons for my tardiness: > > 1. Been swamped with tons of client work lately. > > 2. This was marked as [DECISION]. Seeing this post makes me wonder, can we > here at Apache Flex adopt something holistically without a [VOTE] thread? To > be quite honest this mailing list is so busy that when I get busy as in #1 > above, I have a tendency to skim my inbox for threads marked with [VOTE]. > > That being said, I'm personally not contesting FlexUnit and Mockolate, but on > the other hand can we realistically say that something has been adopted into > the project without a proper [VOTE] thread? > > Maybe one of the mentors can set me straight?
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Getting+Started you can see in the link above that [DECISION] is "Discussion to get a decision in a already discussed matter. " so, it means that the decision will be taken after everybody agreed on something, I guess. -- Mansour Blanco Software engineer Stackoverflow: http://stackoverflow.com/users/612920/mansuro Blog: zuro.blogspot.com github: https://github.com/Mansuro
