I understand your POV. But here I am speaking as a Mentor. This project needs to make sure that the dependencies to the project that we require our users to download are acceptable in combination with the Apache License 2.0.
It would be very bad if releases and project graduation from the Apache Incubator was blocked due to an unfortunate choice of unit test technology. > > On 10/02/2012 10:21, Dave Fisher wrote: >> In the case of ASUnit it is not even clear from the site what the license is. >> > ASUnit is MPL https://github.com/lukebayes/asunit/blob/master/MIT-LICENSE.txt This is called "Category B" http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-b > > Aside from that. For me its enough if its "free for open source purposes" - > GPL or whatever. Confluence (Apache Wiki) and Jira (Bugtracking) are both > just free for open-source projects. > http://www.atlassian.com/software/views/open-source-license-request We need to be careful about "Category X". http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#category-x But then Apache does use GPL in infrastructure in various ways. It's just that we need to take great care with project releases. Regards, Dave > > On 10/02/2012 08:42, JP Bader wrote: >> I have used FlexMonkey from Gorilla Logic >> (http://www.gorillalogic.com/flexmonkey) > A GPL visual testing system - intriguing! I have never heard of it, will dig > it deeper. Thanks! It might be too "visual" but it seems that you can write > it also just in ActionScript, am I wrong? > > On 10/02/2012 08:03, David Francis Buhler wrote: >> I worked for a company that did a large comparison effort for >> functional-testing tools. We liked SilkTest ... > > Interesting! However unfortunately it is not free or open-source - so: not an > option. > > yours > Martin. >
