@Peter I agree with you. But i was not trying to define was Flex is i was just saying what it is now. If Fley has to go HTML5 it should be because is the right thing to do not because HTML5 is the buzzword of today or because there is no Flash on the IPhone,
2012/2/5 Peter Elst <peter.e...@gmail.com> > > We as a Flex community should say we build on top on Flash and we are > happy > > to do so. We dont want to be a new HTML5 library. > > > > I think we should all avoid trying to define what Flex should or should not > be and just contribute and let it evolve organically - with Apache there is > no need for roadmaps, there is no need to dictate what our technology > should be. > > Let your contributions help shape the technology as you like to see it and > don't worry if there are different opinions. > > Once all the practical steps are over, I look forward to more contributions > and less discussion which - with all due respect - does more to divide us > into opposing camps than get excited about the potential of the technology. > There is no need to purely see things black or white, there is room for > many different ideas and see what flourishes. > > Thanks, > Peter >
