On 3 February 2012 10:27, David Arno <da...@davidarno.org> wrote: > Who's brilliant idea was it to divide the single colour vote across four > viable candidates, thus ensuring the multi-coloured option easily won the > vote? This vote couldn't have been more rigged (no doubt completely > accidently in this case) if people had tried! > > How about we make the vote fair?? Either offer up four multi-coloured > options to balance the four single-coloured ones, or change the vote to be > simply between a multi-coloured or single-coloured logo. > > David. > > David we would eventually discuss that on another thread and leave this one just for voting. I think it could be a valid point but if every time someone comes along with a new "issue" with the current vote, it won't ever stop.
-- João Fernandes
