I believe the Status should be matter-of-fact about the state of the project, and read less about subjective elements such as 'enthusiasm' and 'growth opportunities'.
On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Keith Sutton <ke...@spoon.as> wrote: > Maybe not critical to getting out of podling status but metrics from > rallying the community: > 1) 10-12 of existing Flex User Groups have expressed interest in > supporting Apache Flex and are assisting in reaching out to another 20-30 > groups world-wide > 2) Over 50% of ecosystem vendors (30+ out of approximately 60) providing > Flex-related tools, libraries and services have expressed their interest in > supporting Apache Flex > > > > > On 1/31/2012 12:55 PM, David Arno wrote: > >> Alex, >> >> Do you think it worth adding any of the following? >> >> 1. A winning logo was chosen and that we are now working on refining it. >> 2. The delays to the code being made available doesn't seem to have >> tempered >> our enthusiasm and that there have been lots of discussions on people's >> plans and expectations. >> 3. People have started experimenting with the code we already have and >> that >> eg tink has submitted new components. >> >> Not sure if that is the sort of detail that is required though. >> >> David. >> >> >
