A javascript VM exists and works. Dart will be offered as a VM. As apps move from controlled ecosystems back to the web, it is good for the Flash Player's continued VM support when other VMs are used. VMs have a strong future. The Target VM should matter less over the long term if the desired "Target any UI" model works. On Jan 28, 2012 4:49 PM, "Jeffry Houser" <jef...@dot-com-it.com> wrote:
> On 1/28/2012 4:14 PM, Cem Samira wrote: > >> What use is there in supporting a technical very doubtable SWF format >> compared to the JavaScript VM? >> > Sounds like a great idea. Let us know when it's ready. Once you can > demonstrate I'll gladly vote to make you a committer if you're not already. > Or you can submit changes such as this via JIRA. [or, theoretically, you > can take the Flex code from the Apache SVN and create your own distribution > channels] > > > > -- > Jeffry Houser > Technical Entrepreneur > 203-379-0773 > -- > http://www.flextras.com?c=104 > UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! > -- > http://www.theflexshow.com > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > http://www.asktheflexpert.com > -- > Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust > >
