Performance and memory are my top considerations for any code in the framework.
If I submit a patch who reviews it? Does it go straight to the list? On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: jude [mailto:flexcapaci...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 6:31 AM > > To: flex-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Port some mobile components to web > > > > > > Alex, I read the previous mail post and it seems you are hesitant to > > bring > > any mobile components over (I'm probably wrong). But if so what are you > > hesitant about and what would someone need to know who wants to do it > > (which is a few of us on this list)? > > > Sounds like you know everything you need to know. I would still put the > mobile components in their own SWC. And I would be cautious about slowing > them down or making them heavier to support desktop. Every byte counts in > mobile, especially when transcoded to run on IOS. > > In a composition-based framework, you would add in the rollover and other > desktop support when you needed it. > > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Developer > Adobe Systems Inc. > Blog: http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > > >
