On 25 January 2012 08:32, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > On 1/24/12 11:24 PM, "Haykel BEN JEMIA" <hayke...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Alex, you say the prototype was not faster, I suppose this is the case > when > > all features are enabled which is actually a good result (if it's not > > slower). But the idea is that applications almost never require all > > features. > I disabled all but about 8 or so 'behaviors' it needed and it was still > slower. The interstitial time of the required often-used 'behaviors' make > things slower. Most of the stuff you'd disable doesn't really take that > much time in small apps. >
This looks very bad. It looks like often used features must be implemented through inheritance. > > > > Regarding backward-compatibility, if it will prevent innovation, what > about > > working on a new version that is not backward-compatible in parallel to > the > > standard version? Existent applications continue to use the standard > > version which will be maintained with bug fixes and perhaps also some new > > features and when the newer version is out, let's say Apache Flex X (for > > 10), new applications will use it and old applications can be ported (but > > not required). > That is the plan. I hope to 'start over' on my whiteboard. > > Good news! > -- > Alex Harui > Flex SDK Team > Adobe Systems, Inc. > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui > >
