Just to say that I do not agree with the idea that #49 includes something negative, I think just the opposite. For me #42 has a great design and represents something "flex".. but nothing more... and I fear this just becomes one more 'X' in our computing world...
remi > I've already voiced my concerns about #49, which is that the most obvious > symbolism that I see is negative (this has been discussed quite a bit in > other threads). > >