On 1/23/12 5:32 AM, "Ryan Frishberg" <fri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I understand the frustration this is trying to solve, but I don't
> think having an official release like this is a good idea. Imagine
> someone picks up this release, and then wants to upgrade to Flex 4.x
> later on--the backwards-compatibility story would be completely lost.
Not only that, but it would take a long time to update the documentation.
In short, I would veto this change. All changes to 3.x would need to be
considered in terms of how it transitions to 4.x, how we want the
documentation to look, consistency between other components, etc.
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Systems, Inc.
http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
