Not to be confuse why 3.x is consider legacy codebase, Flex 3 are still important for users with legacy Flash player 9 but that is a minor issue since everything will still be done in actionscript. Compare to Microsoft convince .Net (although little slower) is richer in functionality than C++, I can see, most companies has already invested in C++.
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Andrew Morgan <amorga...@gmail.com> wrote: > I will add to the chorus that 3.x is very important. Enterprises are > already at a crossroads with what to do with their large investment Flex, > and much of that is on the 3.x codebase. > > Migrating to 4 is an expensive proposition with unclear benefits, and given > the uncertainty around Flex/Flash, I can't see how to > convince steak-holders to move to 4 right now. > > Not migrating Flex 3.x to apache would be a really bad blow to Flex. Many > of the existing 3.x projects will move to other technologies if this > happens. > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:18 PM, Raju Bitter <rajubit...@googlemail.com>wrote: > >> Sounds like - from an enterprise perspective - the 3.x SDK is more >> important to the community. And those are probably some of the largest >> Flex applications in use. Does Adobe have any numbers on how many >> people are using 3.x vs 4.x? >>
