I was thinking of continuity of the version number. That's it. Like if we ended up doing a huge revamp/improvement/enhancement/whatever, we'd move from version 4.x to version 5.1.
Chris On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:14 PM, Rick Winscot <rick.wins...@gmail.com> wrote: > Continuity of what? There's still a ton of mx in the spark code-base, > functionality is divided among nearly a dozen version numbers, bugs abound... > > What of this do you want to maintain going forward? > > -- > Rick Winscot > > > On Wednesday, January 18, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Rui Silva wrote: > >> > From: "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com (mailto:aha...@adobe.com)> >> > The first release, even if it is >> > just approximate parity with Adobe Flex 4.6 would be called "Apache Flex >> > 2012". Any other release cut this year would be a point release >> > >> >> ("Apache >> > Flex 2012.1") >> > >> > -- >> > Alex Harui >> > Flex SDK Team >> > Adobe Systems, Inc. >> > http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui >> > >> >> >> I'd vote on 4.7. It conveys a stronger idea of continuity. >
