You have associated the logo with the recently half sunken luxury ship in the newspaper? I'm agreed with Calvin Huang.
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 1:42 PM, Calvin Huang <leze.majes...@gmail.com> wrote: > Personally, I see more of a mountain/iceberg than a sunken ship, especially > if you remove the reflection. It's a fine looking logo regardless. > > On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:09 PM, Martin Heidegger > <m...@leichtgewicht.at>wrote: > >> My _first_ association was a half-sunken ship when I saw the logo. And I >> thought therefore the logo was inappropriate. >> If I am alone with this first association I am fine with the logo but I am >> pretty sure I am not the only one who thinks that way. >> So: I hope it does influence the voters as I think its a valid concern. >> >> yours >> Martin >> >> >> On 18/01/2012 14:04, James Ong wrote: >> >>> It's doesn't matter what we see, I hope your message doesn't influence >>> the voters. >>> >>> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Martin Heidegger<m...@leichtgewicht.at> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Does no one see a half sunken ship? >>>> >>> >>
