By all means do it and post it here. I'd rather have more interfaces with a few more bytes and less dependences if I understand you correctly.
On Monday, January 16, 2012, David Arno <da...@davidarno.org> wrote: >> From: Tink [mailto:f...@tink.ws ] >> Sent: 16 January 2012 08:21 >> There is also a small amount of code the make sure the selected index or > carat is >> visible (as a Scroller doesn't have any logic for selected items). > > > We clearly have very different ideas on "a small amount of code". > > David. > >
