It's a good thing I don't get worked up about things. :P #toomuchcaffeineortechnomusic
On Friday, January 13, 2012, jude <flexcapaci...@gmail.com> wrote: > The Flex SDK (the Apache Flex project) is the source of everything related to Flex. If you want to get Flex you come here. Isn't this now the official channel / site? Is there another site that people will go? If this *is* the official place then it should be the landing page for Flex resources or links to them. > > This is obvious to me but if you cut off the branches of a tree they die on their own. Right now the Flex Apache project is the tree. If you don't have a source you have disjointed, independent entities all repeating. Maybe I'm missing something. > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:43 AM, David Arno <da...@davidarno.org> wrote: >> >> > From: jude [mailto:flexcapaci...@gmail.com] >> > Sent: 13 January 2012 10:48 >> > >> > I have to agree with Sebastian on this. I think it is the responsibility >> of the architects to >> > show how they intend the architecture should be used. At least in an >> abstract way. >> >> I'm going to repeat myself from yesterday here. If you think this >> documentation is useful, get writing it. Clearly some folk disagree with you >> and they won't help you write it. Others might agree and may help you. >> >> If what you commit it or submit it as a patch gets approval, then it'll form >> part of future Apache Flex releases. If folk veto it, it won't. Either way, >> it has to be more productive than this endless "Yes we should. No we >> shouldn't" bickering over this topic. >> >> David. >> > >
