> From: "Csomák Gábor" <csom...@gmail.com>

>
> not bad. my 2nd favorite so far :)
> could you try it with bigger inner arrows (meaning smaller outer)? I'm not
> sure it would be better, but maybe.
>

That was what I was about to suggest too. As is, the logo appears to be too 
bulky and less elegant. There's another problem with that bulkiness, it is too 
similar to a known Celt symbol used by a certain dictator who, unfortunately, 
turned an extremely beautiful symbol conveying strength and balance into a 
outcast dabble that is synonym of terror and fear.

You spin the logo quite well and I agree with all the significant parts you 
identified. There's just one lacking, flexibility leads to elegance which the 
bulky arrows and lettering fail to communicate.

I'd try Csomák's suggestion and tone down a little bit the outward arrows (also 
because usability should, at least, be as important as scalability). The Flex 
word could also be a little bulky and more elegant (not fancy). In the general 
sense the logo really needs a little more breathing space. Everything else is 
quite nicely thought out.

Cheers,
Rui

Reply via email to