Jun, I apologize... I didn't mean to make it sound like everyone should be using command line SVN! My recommendation is limited to the poor soul(s) that will be tasked with getting the repository moved and ready to go... I've used a number of GUI clients and found that most implement only a sub-set of SVN features. For fine-grained operations, I've had to fallback to the command line to get things done. Also, there is an issue with speed. Visual updates in a GUI client slow SVN operations down considerably... so... if you're getting paid hourly - disregard anything I've said. ;-)
-- Rick Winscot On Friday, January 6, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Jun Heider wrote: > > On Jan 6, 2012, at 3:03 PM, Rick Winscot wrote: > > > I'm not sure about SmartSVN - I'm a command-line kinda guy. In fact... for > > an operation this large I would recommend _not_ using a GUI client for sake > > of speed and stability. > > I may be in the minority and I'm not opposed to using the command-line, but > it's 2012 and when you have a decent GUI tool why not use it? Also, I think > if we want a higher amount of community involvement in the long run forcing > command line only might be a detriment.