While Spoon has some initial committers in the mix, every commit is still bound by the rules of Apache and getting voted out. Obviously everything we do is in the open right in an Apache workspace off of the Apache Flex project.
We do have specific big BIG goals that we want to include in the framework. We are prepping an open meeting to discuss some of these initiatives that we plan to tackle. If you like them, join in. If you have no interest and want to focus on another section, more power to you. J On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:17 PM, Fréderic Cox <frede...@exuvis.com> wrote: > This makes sense to me if we can also vote on the features of Spoon to > influence priority > > On 04/01/12 21:08, "Jonathan Campos" <jonbcam...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >That is an exact question that I asked at the Flex Summit specifically for > >the group. > > > >Roy Fielding had a great analogy/answer. > >The main idea is that this is that we are throwing a party, not running a > >business with free labor. So people need to be energized about what they > >are doing, they aren't there to be given tasks. > > > >As such there is no roadmap. You may come up with a great idea and start > >working on it, then when other people see what you are doing they may > >join. > >Over time your idea snowballs and gets added in, but this doesn't mean > >that > >there is a formal roadmap for people to sit at and program away against. > > > >However this is where Spoon comes in. We do have plans and roadmaps of > >features we want to add. Some take time and require people. If you are > >interested in our roadmap (our party) you and anyone else is free to join. > > > >Make sense? > > > >J > > > >On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 1:58 PM, Peter Elst <peter.e...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Thats a good point I've not been clear on either - is roadmap discussed > >>on > >> the mailinglist and voted on so there's a bit of structure to what type > >>of > >> things get worked on rather than a random collection of bug fixes and > >> non-related features? > >> > >> - Peter > >> > >> > >> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 7:17 PM, Jeffry Houser <jef...@dot-com-it.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> > > >> > Be sure to watch the "What it Means to be an Apache Project" from the > >> > Flex Summit, here: > >> > > >> > http://tv.adobe.com/show/flex-**community-summit-december-**2011/< > >> http://tv.adobe.com/show/flex-community-summit-december-2011/> > >> > > >> > My understanding is that we do whatever we want. I don't know how > >>that > >> > goes from "chaos" to "release" yet, though. > >> > > >> > > >> > On 1/4/2012 2:12 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi All, > >> >> > >> >> I was just curious if there was any Apache Flex specific information > >> >> floating around about how duties might be divided on each others > >> strength > >> >> in relation to our understanding of the SDK. > >> >> > >> >> I know there is the official committer information page that Alex > >> >> provided but has there been any discussion on how an initial > >>committer > >> can > >> >> prepare for whats to be expected in the Apache Flex project? > >> >> > >> >> Or is this just to soon to ask this question? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks, > >> >> Mike > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > -- > >> > Jeffry Houser > >> > Technical Entrepreneur > >> > 203-379-0773 > >> > -- > >> > http://www.flextras.com?c=104 > >> > UI Flex Components: Tested! Supported! Ready! > >> > -- > >> > http://www.theflexshow.com > >> > http://www.jeffryhouser.com > >> > http://www.asktheflexpert.com > >> > -- > >> > Part of the DotComIt Brain Trust > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > > > >-- > >Jonathan Campos > >Dallas Flex User Group Manager > >http://www.d-flex.org/ > >blog: http://www.unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos > >twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jonbcampos > > -- Jonathan Campos Dallas Flex User Group Manager http://www.d-flex.org/ blog: http://www.unitedmindset.com/jonbcampos twitter: http://www.twitter.com/jonbcampos
