Martijn van Beurden wrote:
There are still a lot of things that can be improved in libFLAC, so I think I'll leave it be for a while when this works. I agree it is not efficient, but for now, chained ogg is a niche use case for FLAC. I'd
Incremental steps are usually best. I think mostly you want to avoid painting yourself into a corner API-wise. I haven't thought deeply about whether your current proposal does that, but at least considering how you would extend it to support the things I described should help identify blockers and whether you will need additional ABI breaks, etc. It's worth at least reading through the code I pointed to with those things in mind.
_______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
