On Thu, 25 Jun 2020 at 23:11, Tor-Einar Jarnbjo <tor-ei...@jarnbjo.name> wrote:
>
> Isn't the FLAC encoder 'tuned' for the compression of audio data at common 
> sample rates anyway? Does it make sense to use FLAC to compress arbitrary 
> analog data at very high sample rates as opposed to other general purpose 
> compression algorithms?

The idea is to actually use it for playback, not just storage, and
nothing else has the nice asymmetrical fast decompression with such
effective compression (wavpack supports 705/768 but is woefully slow
on decompression and poorly supported). Mostly the sample rates would
be multiples of the common 44.1/48 sample rates so I expect
compression to be equally good with simple extrapolation to bigger
equivalent sized windows.

Thanks,
Con
>
> Tor
>
> Am 25.06.2020 um 14:49 schrieb Martijn van Beurden:
>
> Op di 2 jun. 2020 om 05:59 schreef Con Kolivas <ker...@kolivas.org>:
>>
>> It would be nice if the flac container was
>> extensible to any arbitrary value for research purposes.
>
>
> Probably not the answer that you were hoping for, but because it is only for 
> research purposes, why not store the samplerate outside of the container, or 
> in the comments as metadata? The FLAC encoder doesn't care what samplerate 
> your material is, it just stores it for easy playback. You can store 10MHz 
> information, tell the FLAC encoder it is 48kHz, and add a tag 
> samplerate=10000000  or even samplerate=10MHz, whatever your processing 
> scripts accept.
>
> As you are clearly using FLAC for something it wasn't made for, that doesn't 
> seem like a very big workaround to me?
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Martijn van Beurden
>
> _______________________________________________
> flac-dev mailing list
> flac-dev@xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> flac-dev mailing list
> flac-dev@xiph.org
> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Reply via email to