Andrew,

I think it is neither Rice Coding nor Exponential Golomb Coding. The one used in FLAC is Golomb-Rice coding, which is almost optimal for the Laplace (exponential) statistical distribution of residuals after modelling.

Best regards,

Federico



On 06/06/2017 0:52, Andrew James Weaver wrote:
Hello all!
(cc-ing the flac-dev list)

I would like to give an update as to the recent CELLAR work on the FLAC specification.

• Work has been done to make internal and external links more accurate and reliable.
• 'Rice Coding' has been clarified as 'Exponential Golomb Coding.'
• Clarifications have been made for binary representation.
• Typos and other small changes have been fixed for clarity.

Lastly, a version 00 release has been made (available at https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/releases) and the draft document has been uploaded to the IETF datatracker (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xiph-cellar-flac/)

All the best!
Andrew Weaver

On Mon, May 22, 2017 at 11:06 AM, Dave Rice <d...@dericed.com <mailto:d...@dericed.com>> wrote:


    On May 12, 2017, at 1:05 PM, Dave Rice <d...@dericed.com
    <mailto:d...@dericed.com>> wrote:

    Hi all,
    And cc'ing flac-dev.

    On May 10, 2017, at 12:15 PM, Dave Rice <d...@dericed.com
    <mailto:d...@dericed.com>> wrote:

    Hi Andrew,

    On May 10, 2017, at 11:19 AM, Andrew James Weaver <we...@uw.edu
    <mailto:we...@uw.edu>> wrote:

    Hello all!

    In a previous discussions on this list about people interested
    in working on the FLAC standard, I said that I would be willing
    to start the process of converting the existing standard into
    Markdown. I am writing to inform the list that I have begun
    preliminary work on this conversion.

    Currently that work is living
    herehttps://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown
    <https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown>.

    I sent a pull request at
    https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/pull/1
    <https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/pull/1>, which
    starts to add a process to convert the markdown to the RFC
    format using the same Makefile approach that we use with the
    FFV1 and EBML markdown files. There's still a lot of
    inter-document cross-referencing that needs to be adjusted
    before the Makefile works. For instance current
    cross-referencing like:

    [*SUBFRAME\_VERBATIM*](#subframe_verbatim)

    won't render as expected in a plain text RFC, but would simply
    render to something like "Section X.X.X".

    In EBML we use markdown such as
    See [the section on `Element Data Size`](#element-data-size) for rules that 
apply to elements of unknown length.
    so that in the RFC this renders to
    See Section 7 for rules that apply to elements of unknown length.
    and in the markdown it renders to

    Seethe section on|Element Data Size|
    
<https://github.com/Matroska-Org/ebml-specification/blob/master/specification.markdown#element-data-size>for
    rules that apply to elements of unknown length.

    I added some issues to the flac_markdown repository and Andrew
    addressed them
    inhttps://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/pull/7
    <https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/pull/7>. Most of
    these issues pertain to unintended semantic differences between
    the FLAC specification as it exists in its original HTML form at
    https://xiph.org/flac/format.html
    <https://xiph.org/flac/format.html>and the markdown rendition
    being worked on at
    https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/blob/master/flac.md
    <https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/blob/master/flac.md>.

    Since the recent work focuses on a change of format from HTML to
    markdown, I suggest that short term goals on the flac
    specification focus on:
    - verifying semantic equalness with the html version
    - resolving issues that block the mmark/xml2rfc process that
    generates the RFC formats of the specification
    - add standard RFC boilerplate (abstract, rfc2119, etc)

    To summarize recent work on the FLAC specification, the document
    has been adjusted in its new markdown format in order to achieve
    semantic similarity to the original HTML rendition on the xiph.org
    <http://xiph.org> site. In order to get the structural data (such
    as the tables at the end of https://xiph.org/flac/format.html
    <https://xiph.org/flac/format.html>) to fit in plain text RFC
    style, the tables were dissected a bit to separate value lists
    from structural lists. In this way the subcomponents and defined
    in their own sections instead of the prior strategy of detailing
    lists and pseudocode within large tables. For instance see the
    original rendition of the frame header documentation from
    https://xiph.org/flac/format.html#frame_header
    <https://xiph.org/flac/format.html#frame_header> compared to the
    dissected version which gives the subcomponents their own
    subsequent sections at
    
https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/blob/7a5c21d49d1fda89609ffa9edfca2447c7ca3c5e/flac.md#frame_header
    
<https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/blob/7a5c21d49d1fda89609ffa9edfca2447c7ca3c5e/flac.md#frame_header>.
    Splitting out the subcomponents into their own sections also gives
    space to be more explicate in defining them, such as
    
https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/commit/3aaa5f293102018bd7c41409e79e36f510557d96
    
<https://github.com/privatezero/flac_markdown/commit/3aaa5f293102018bd7c41409e79e36f510557d96>.

    Andrew noticed that there are some issues with managing section
    titles that contain underscores and getting internal sectional
    citations to work. For instance (#frame-header) will link to
    `FRAME HEADER` (space) but not `FRAME_HEADER` (underscore). Is
    there any reason not to swap the all-caps, underscored component
    names to tilde-quoted, all caps name with spaces rather than
    underscores?

    For convenience, here is a rendering of the plain text RFC output
    of git-master of the FLAC format repository:
    https://gist.github.com/dericed/2639d0eed5e064b4dec1399bc8716833
    <https://gist.github.com/dericed/2639d0eed5e064b4dec1399bc8716833>.

    I suggest reviews of the current markdown from those familiar with
    the historical FLAC format specification so that we ensure that
    the current work is the same in meaning to the original html
    version of the specification.

    Best Regards,
    Dave Rice

    _______________________________________________
    Cellar mailing list
    cel...@ietf.org <mailto:cel...@ietf.org>
    https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar
    <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/cellar>




--
Andrew Weaver, MLIS
American Archive of Public Broadcasting
National Digital Stewardship Resident @ CUNY TV
we...@uw.edu <mailto:we...@uw.edu>


_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Reply via email to