On Dec 30, 2015, at 3:09 AM, Thomas Zander <thomas.e.zan...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On 29 December 2015 at 21:50, lvqcl <lvqcl.m...@gmail.com> wrote: >> So, does it make sense to #define FLAC__BYTES_PER_WORD (in bitreader.c) >> as 4 for 32-bit and as 8 for 64-bit targets? > > Your tests so far imply this is a sensible default. > I'd say go ahead. We can always change it if it turns out there is a > better option. > > Riggs
What's wrong with something incredible simple, like: #define FLAC__BYTES_PER_WORD (sizeof(int)) ? _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
