lvqcl wrote: > Does it make sense to restore the ability to use FLAC__BYTES_PER_WORD == 8? > (Honestly, I'm not sure that it ever worked previously...
I'm actually pretty sure that it never worked. > and I'm not sure that > this change can improve libFLAC performance). I'll take your word on that. > Or is it better to change the comment that implies that it's possible? The think in and ideal world we would a: * Make it work correctly FLAC__BYTES_PER_WORD == 8 and compare the performance with FLAC__BYTES_PER_WORD == 4. * If there is an statistically measurable performance, keep it, otherwise remove the FLAC__BYTES_PER_WORD == 8 code all together. Since you seem to think there little to be gainned, maybe its better to just remove the FLAC__BYTES_PER_WORD == 8 code now. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
