There have been some offers to help building for various platforms: http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-July/004271.html and there was discussion last year to create official ‘blessed builds’, compiled by Xiph for security reasons. http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2013-July/004274.html
However, this sounds like something that can be sorted out after the release of the source tarball, no? Maurits On 23 Nov 2014, at 11:36, Olav Sunde <o...@olavsunde.net> wrote: > I'd definately recommend binaries for download as suggested by lvqcl and > Janne Hyvärinen. All the fabolous work on the code base is of little use to > me if I can not find binaries at the official site. > > Olav Sunde > > > At 12:01 23.11.2014, Janne Hyvärinen wrote: >> On 23.11.2014 12:44, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> > lvqcl wrote: >> >> 2) Do you plan to release any official binaries (flac, metaflac, maybe >> >> something else)? >> > Nor had I planned to release binaries. >> >> At least Windows users expect to find official version at >> https://xiph.org/flac/download.html. Right now it links to old >> sourceforge page http://sourceforge.net/projects/flac/files/flac-win/ >> that only has version 1.2.1. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> flac-dev mailing list >> flac-dev@xiph.org >> http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev > _______________________________________________ > flac-dev mailing list > flac-dev@xiph.org > http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
_______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
