Miroslav Lichvar wrote:

> Hm, does this mean that every process encoding FLAC files will now
> need extra 10MB of memory? Is that ok for small devices with limited
> memory?

What small device do you have in mind? The smallest device I could
possibly imagine *encoding* FLAC on is Rasberry Pi which has 512Meg
of RAM.

If you really are concerned about this (and knowing that it has little
benefit on Linux) maybe we could wrap it in a Windows only #ifdef.

Erik
-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Erik de Castro Lopo
http://www.mega-nerd.com/
_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Reply via email to