Erik de Castro Lopo wrote: >> Sure. But maybe it makes sense to write "WARNING" instead of an "ERROR"? > > Well its an ERROR because the flac executable will exit with a non-zero > exit code, so this condition can be caught in for example a shell script. > > If its only a warning, why would the executable return non-zero?
But why should it return non-zero exit code? The input files are valid, all calculations are valid, but FLAC returns an error... IMHO it's counter-intuitive: I can't find another lossless encoder or general-purpose file archiver that works in the same way. _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
