On 28-04-13 13:23, LRN wrote:
On 28.04.2013 13:38, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
I have tagged 1.3.0pre4 in git and provided a tarball here:

http://downloads.xiph.org/releases/flac/beta/flac-1.3.0pre4.tar.xz

I have built and tested the git tree on:

linux-x86_64 openbsd5-i386 freebsd5-i386
i686-w64-mingw32 - builds correctly, passes all tests (NT 6.1.7601).
Add to that:
- linux-x86_64 (passed usual tests, when configured with no options, --enable-sse)
- minGW (not w64) on Windows 7 32-bit
- Visual Studio 2012 on Windows 7 32-bit
- armv6l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf (raspbian)

Furthermore I've ran the tests I used for the lossless comparison which is on the FLAC website. The results are attached. I'm not sure what happened, but it seems something happened to my system (I did no software update or something of that sort), the results are not fully reproducible when considering decoding. I'll look into this. However, these results still show that there hasn't been a (severe) regression in performance on linux.

Attachment: All tracks-decode.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Attachment: All tracks-encode.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

_______________________________________________
flac-dev mailing list
flac-dev@xiph.org
http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev

Reply via email to