Are you sure that the encoding library was improved, or just the command line?
Keep in mind that 1-8 (or 0-8) are just macros for particular combinations of options that are also available separately. I'm just guessing, here, but 9-12 might be nothing more than selected combinations of options that are already available in the official flac command-line, albeit without a short, numerical abbreviation. Brian Willoughby Sound Consulting On Mar 13, 2013, at 02:49, Marko Uibo wrote: > Is it planned someday to implement additional higher (9-12) > compression > modes like in Flake? > > http://flake-enc.sourceforge.net/ > > It's not very important I think. Harddrive space isn't problem today. > But it preserves other indepentent work done on Flac and give room for > some extra albums on harddrive. I think development of flake is > stopped. > > I plan to test my ~20 GB flac collection how big difference flake -12 > gives me. But I still use reference implementation for my main > collection. _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
