Tim W. wrote: > I'm personally in favor of mapping (1) as it doesn't vary between 6.1/7.1, > and is fully compatible with the WAVEFORMATEXTENSIBLE specification.
I'm in favour of Tims proposal and intent to apply Ralph's patch to implement this unless someone comes up with a really good reason not to. Erik -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Erik de Castro Lopo http://www.mega-nerd.com/ _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list flac-dev@xiph.org http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
