At 10:30 10.02.2012, you wrote: I'd go for Earl Chew's solution as this corrects a possible calculation error, plus it will also handle 192 kHz. Ideally replay gain sample rate analysis should follow sample rate capability of flac itself.
Olav Sunde >Hi all, > >In the last couple of months, there have been two proposed patches for >the regain play analysis code. > >The first by Nathan Rennie-Waldock: > > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2011-December/003070.html > >simply adds some more higher sample rates. > >The second by Earl Chew: > > http://lists.xiph.org/pipermail/flac-dev/2012-January/003067.html > >is more comprehensive. Neither of the patches currently apply to >the code that is currently in git [0], so now is probably a good time >to discuss these patches and come up with the best approach. Currently >I lean slightly toward Earl Chew's patch because it seems a little more >thought out. > >Once we have decided on the best solution, I would appreciate it if >either Earl or Nathan could prepare a new patch. > >Cheers, >Erik >-- >---------------------------------------------------------------------- >Erik de Castro Lopo >http://www.mega-nerd.com/ > > >_______________________________________________ >flac-dev mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
_______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
