-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 06.02.2012 18:52, Olav Sunde wrote: > At 14:16 06.02.2012, you wrote: > >> Olav, >> >> A change like this could easily break the format. That would be >> a bad choice. > > That makes sense. Explains why it is not there today. > > >> On the other hand, an informational 'application' block could be >> added in a way that does not break the format, and this would >> even be backwards compatible since 'application' blocks have >> always been a part of the specification. You simply won't be >> able to rely on them being there. > > This is probably the best thing then. Adding the info will be > optional? It would certainly be an improvement and hopefully become > part of the command line description so users would know how to do > it. > Make a specification for storing this kind of data in app-block, then devise a way to measure encoding complexity of existing FLAC stream - and you'll be able to put these block in FLAC files that didn't have them originally. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPL/EaAAoJEOs4Jb6SI2CwBXgH/jaff2VYtoRfZEmU5iy5MXwT lr/jDUkxgW11MLdXzZXk3Xwlg40iqPaE0Egn7Ie5SM2DgoVU52k7NrR6uC+U8Ii3 +cUp7EAH3bIRVrREeAPfhVUJiyCJSVmemBLPrRWRktaFeMBhw5K6wynG6lvQBTDm Kj7m6F8H4JLMEI5PoTY/ur3L4/G4yZ++4jwTMNvicO8EljlLCdKVE6X+Ojb3kF7G TkZyOsGZaSglETqkT8nZuVChq4DYSUcOX+MEeo3Ovdu1U6WefULw8VnFsqhL2yMU OhRbo7+3+GzxHeMvF2Vo08smcA1BTThCiHCuZaYNmJ0n1Z86/xwk2xh8o4/CTM8= =MRol -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ flac-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
