--- Miroslav Lichvar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 03:48:10PM +0900, ??? wrote: > > FLAC__bitbuffer_read_rice_signed_block() function has most > proccessing > > time. > > Any comments or advices for optimization shall always be welcome. > > I sent a patch improving this function to the old mailing list on > 6 Feb 2003 18:33:40 +0100, subject "bitbuffer optimizations". I > don't know if it is still possible to apply the patch to the current > code.
it probably can, I haven't touched the bitbuffer in a long time. I will revisit it after the release (had lost track of it). Josh __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com _______________________________________________ Flac-dev mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.xiph.org/mailman/listinfo/flac-dev
