Hello Chris, Check out http://www.photo-i.co.uk/
The author, Vincent, has done some extensive reviews for the latest flat bed scanners from Epson and Canon. I owned a Canon 8800F and recently upgraded to Nikon CoolScan V. Obviously, there is a big difference between the scans from these scanners. However, per the site I mentioned, some of the more recent flatbed scanners show results that are closer to the older dedicated film scanners. -Navjot On Apr 12, 2005 7:50 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi All, > > I have just purchased a Bronica SQ body from ebay (after using a Mamiya 645 > at college). Wow - seeing those images on the enlarger! > > Obviously my Scan Dual will not do MF negs, and I have seen favourable > reviews of the Epson 4180 (which does 120 roll film). Has anyone used this > scanner? It is a flatbed (USB2), with a built in film attachemnt in the lid. > > It claims to be 4800dpi x 9600dpi - but I'm unsure as to how that works - > and they only quote times to scan 120 film to 4800 ppi. > > It also does 35 mm - so how well does it cope with these, as I'm sure I will > not be allowed to have 2 scanners in the house ;). > > I shoot HP5 almost exclusively (and 1 or 2 Reala 100 colour). > > TIA, > > Chris > > -- > This message has been scanned for viruses and > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > believed to be clean. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
