RantMode=On Does it bug anyone else that so many of these tests are run at small apertures? Too few are at f/5.6 or f/8 where a typical good prime is at its best. It's not like subjects hundreds of feet away need f/16 for DOF, so the lenses are needlessly handicapped by diffraction.
RantMode=Off, BobG At 02:54 AM 7/15/2004, you wrote: >Norm, >Although both of the below sites compare the 1DS >(similar to your SLR/n) with a Rollei and a Mamiya 7 >(more sq. mm than your Hassy), I found the sites to be >informative and ran tests much better than I could >hope to do. > >http://www.photographical.net/canon_1ds_mf.html > >http://www.wlcastleman.com/equip/reviews/Eos1Ds/build/building.htm > >Hope this helps. > >Warren > > >--- Norm Carver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am in the midst of doing a basic comparison > > between my Hasselblad and the > > new Kodak SLR Pro (14mb, full frame). > >===== >Warren Xato > >For where to go when you know when >[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >__________________________________ >Do you Yahoo!? >New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - Send 10MB messages! >http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe >filmscanners' >or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title >or body ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
