Howard Grill wrote: >Petru...Thanks for your response. I looked at your Black and White sample >from your website..though I have to admit I looked at it in the web browser >as opposed to in Photoshop. > This comment was about the color photos, so don't worry about it.
> While it looks to me that Neat Image did a nice >job removing grain it also looked to me like there was also a loss in image >sharpness in the eyes and hair. > That's why I said that this image is not the best of the best. If I recall, this was the first time I used NeatImage. It is possible to fine tune the filter settings for "high frequency" (high detail) areas and if you're careful you can get very good results. For pathological cases I suppose you could do a selection in Photoshop and apply the NeatImage filter with different settings on this selection and on the rest of the image. >I am not sure if those images were already sharpened or not. > No, they weren't. >What do you think, having printed them? > I've only printed it in 8x10". Grain-wise the image looks very smooth. I believe that you can get a demo version of NeatImage and experiment with it. Have fun! P. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
