Dan Tavernier, Fla Keys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: November 7, 2003 7:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners_Digest] filmscanners Digest for Sat 8 Nov, 2003 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Topic: [filmscanners] RE: OT: Resizing without resampling ==================================================== Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 12:30:02 -0500 From: "Nagaraj, Ramesh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------------------- Thanks all for clarifying=20 Ramesh -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of LAURIE SOLOMON Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 11:42 PM To: Nagaraj, Ramesh Subject: [filmscanners] RE: OT: Resizing without resampling You are correct; it should not effect the sharpening per se, although it = may alter the perception of the sharpening. When you resize without = resampling, you are only changing the effective resolution but not the actual resolution. In short if you make the image larger, you are not = decreasing the number of pixels in the file but merely spreading them out further = so as to have fewer per inch but not fewer in the image file. When you = resample, you are changing the overall number of pixels in the image file. Typically, such resizing or even resampling does not lessen the = sharpening making it softer for all practical purposes; but resampling can and = often does create artifacts which resizing alone does not. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Nagaraj, Ramesh Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2003 12:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] OT: Resizing without resampling I have document that is color corrected and sharpened. Adobe's Image size dialogbox has "Pixel size" and "Document size". After sharpening, I am using "Image size"->"Document size"(with Resample checkbox off) to change the width, height and resolution without = resampling. My questions are *Does this documennt still hold the sharpening? *Should I have done resizing before sharpening? I do not have backup of color corrected images. Here I am changing the width, height and resolution without resampling; = my understanding is this only adds some metadata to document. I think sharpening will get retained after this resizing. I am doing this for printing, pls confirm whether my understanding is = right. Thanks Ramesh -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --- ------------ Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message = title or body --- Incoming mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.528 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 10/16/2003 --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.528 / Virus Database: 324 - Release Date: 10/16/2003 -------------------------------------------------------------------------= --------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe = filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message = title or body -=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=- Topic: [filmscanners] Re: Thanks =========================== Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 16:22:22 +1000 From: "Peter Marquis-Kyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------------------- Berry Ives wrote: > Think about having someone shoot some T400 CN film at your wedding. Then > you can have some fun scanning and printing B&W.... Nah, too easy. What about Kodachrome. LS-30s just love Kodachrome :) Peter Marquis-Kyle -=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=- Topic: [filmscanners] Thanks ======================= Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2003 22:57:28 -0700 From: Berry Ives <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------------------- on 11/6/03 7:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just a quick thanks to everyone who responded about the new Pentax camera. > It's probably unlikely I'll be able to afford one soon - much as I would > love to avoid the issues with scanning on the LS30. :) The reason I'm > unlikely > to be able to afford it soon is that I just got engaged - so there's a lot > of other things which now have to take priority over buying camera gear! > > Looks like I'll be waiting a while to join the digital revolution - and > praying my LS30 keeps working for quite a while to come! FWIW I am reasonably > happy with the scanner - as long as I don't put grainy or silver based film > in it. :) > > Rob > > ------------- > How do you know if you never try? > (Rob Geraghty 25 June 2002) > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > ---------- > Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe > filmscanners' > or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or > body Think about having someone shoot some T400 CN film at your wedding. Then you can have some fun scanning and printing B&W.... -=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=- Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 21:53:38 -0000 From: "John Mahany" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------------------- << The reason I'm unlikely to be able to afford it soon is that I just got engaged >> Rob, take advice -- buy it now or you won't get another chance for 30 years until the kids have left home ... John -=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=- Topic: Thanks ======== Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 12:32:11 +1000 From: "Rob Geraghty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------------------------------- Just a quick thanks to everyone who responded about the new Pentax camera= . It's probably unlikely I'll be able to afford one soon - much as I would= love to avoid the issues with scanning on the LS30. :) The reason I'm un= likely to be able to afford it soon is that I just got engaged - so there's a lo= t of other things which now have to take priority over buying camera gear! Looks like I'll be waiting a while to join the digital revolution - and praying my LS30 keeps working for quite a while to come! FWIW I am reaso= nably happy with the scanner - as long as I don't put grainy or silver based fi= lm in it. :) Rob ------------- How do you know if you never try? (Rob Geraghty 25 June 2002) -=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
