I didn't write any of this, nor was I even quoted in any of the exchange. A bit of prejudicial assumption on your part, perhaps?
As you will note from your own email software, these quotes were written by Austin. I also do not use Vuescan, but I have not made any comments about it relative to this debate, Dickie, oh, I mean David ;-) Art David J. Littleboy wrote: > "Austin Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I have little experience with Viewscan, > <<<<<<<<<< > > FWIW, Arthur, your cheapshots against Vuescan are really stupid; you don't > know what you are talking about. It's a powerful, flexible, scanner driver. > It's not about "automation" at all. The software provided with scanners does > a lot more things automatically than Vuescan. > > > as I have no need for it. My > scanner software gives me perfect scans, because I know how to use it. > Setpoint too and tonal curve tool. Anything beyond that is purely fluff, at > least for my scanner. > <<<<<<<<< > > The last I checked, Vuescan doesn't have a curves tool, although it's high > on the author's list of things to add. What it does have support for is > color calibration. > > David J. Littleboy > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Tokyo, Japan > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
