So embedding the color space into the image file ? I do that all the time, but understood that the only viewing/editing software featuring Color Management and able to use the embedded color spaces is Photoshop and perhaps a very few others, while the most common things (like ACDs and Windows viewer) cannot benefit from this feature which is the reason of image appearance varying among every other system.
Regards, Alex Z -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Atkielski Sent: Saturday, April 20, 2002 4:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Profiles Michael writes: > I remember Adobe's Chris Cox commenting on > sRGB being represenative of "cheap" monitors. As I recall, sRGB was largely based on NTSC gamut, which is indeed pretty "cheap" compared to what good monitors are capable of displaying. sRGB was sort of a lowest common denominator. > Why convert your archived scan to anything? You don't have to convert it, but you should prepare it in an identified color space and store that information in the archived image, so that anyone retrieving it later can get the colors as you left them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
