[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > I use a Nikon 4000ED with a roll film adapter to scan full rolls. It's > almost great. The hardware IS great, but the software is so buggy it seldom > finishes a complete roll before it crashes. It usually scans 6-12 neg's and
Bob, I have the SA-30 as well and I have my roll scans done without a problem using Vuescan! Get it, especially the color rendition is almost always right on the spot, NikonScan handles fine only a small number of cases. A bit hassle is the adjustement of the film offset for the 1st frame, but once set, the Vuescan autocrop makes a wonderful job in contrast to the permanent failure of NikonScan to position the frames exact the same position. Thomas. > then closes down the program. I simply reopen the program and start > scanning where I left off. It DOES run semi-unattended. If the software > didn't crash, it would be hassle-free. It takes about 2-3 hours to scan a > full roll, at 4000dpi with digital ice enabled, on my dual xeon-450 > workstation. Lower resolutions are much faster. Hope this helps > > Bob Kehl > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "stephen.hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Friday, March 08, 2002 7:21 AM > Subject: [filmscanners] filmscanner for business use > > Hi > I run a Kodak Express minilab and lately am getting more business requiring > the burning of complete rolls of 35mm and APS film to CD. Currently I am > doing about 1 roll per day which I have to send to Kodak for processing. I'd > much rather do this in house and would be glad of any advice on which > scanner to buy to scan rolls of film, strips of film and slides, budget is > up to �2,000. I already have a CD burner on the PC. > > Thanks > Steve Hudson ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
