> Austin Franklin wrote: > > > > > > I think you have done a good conclusion here. If you go back in > > > the mailing > > > list you found what I have been written about film flatness > problems . > I > > > did last summer a test with my own 3 scanners LS2000. LS4000 and > Polaroid > > > 35+ against Imacon Photo. > > > None of them could match the Imacon scanner in sharpness and Dmax. > > > > How do you know that any of the scanners weren't doing some > sharpening on > > their own? I'm asking if you confirmed that they weren't... I would > > specifically suspect the Imacon did some sharpening...I don't know about > the > > others. > > > Austin > > All sharpening was off, we double checked it to ensure an even test. We > also turned it on to see the difference and, to be honest, the > Flextight was > as sharp with sharpening turned off as the other two were with it > turned on. > Turning sharpening on in the Flextight did produce absolutely stunning > scans, the best I have seen I think. > > I have sent an email to Imacon to check that there is no hardware > sharpening > being done without the being aware of it. >
Hi Simon, How do you know sharpening was off? See Moreno's post...point is, it's not so easy to know what the hardware is actually doing! Regards, Austin ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
