Interesting review for printing from digital cameras. Too bad they only used lower resolution images than the ones common on this list. There's a lot of resampling, sharpening, interpolation, etc. going on in the print drivers when the best source is a 2000x3000 that was already interpolated in camera. (not that I'd turn down a D1x if one dropped in my lap ;-) )The review also was a bit too reliant on the "select & go" options for the printers instead of manual tweaking. I'm suspicious of speed tests on a PC so starved for RAM: Win98, 1.4 Ghz P4 but only 128 MB RAM. Someone really should've caught that.
BobG (1280 owner) At 02:43 AM 2/27/2002, you wrote: >I just read this review which says the Canon S9000 images look better than >the Epson 1280. >Any one here have any personal experience with the Canon? How good is the >Color profile? > >http://www.techtv.com/products/hardware/story/0,23008,3373126,00.html > > >Bob Kehl > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- >Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe >filmscanners' >or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title >or body ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
