>> I doubt that's a hair on or near the lens. Although you >> used a wide angle lens, I'd be very surprised it could focus >> that close to the lens or even a filter ring.
I just used a normal lens (the one that came as standard on the Canon). I don't have any extra lenses yet, although I want to get a telephoto for wildlife photography at some point. I also don't have any filter rings (and wouldn't have the faintest idea what filters I should even consider buying/using!). I'm fairly certain it was a hair on the lens, as 8 other pictures taken from the same day have the hair in precisely the same place, and the same line marks the prints that I got when the negatives were developed, before I'd even scanned them. It's unlikely to be a hair that got caught up in the development process, as the only pictures on that film with the hair in them were those taken on the same day that the picture I posted was taken. >> If it isn't a real hair stuck in the slide mount or on the >> negs (I'm not sure what type of film was used), or it could >> have been a hair actually in the camera at or near the film >> plane. The film was just 35mm Fuji film (can't remember which exact type). Mark ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
