> > >About a year ago, I saw a NASA website which was showing some filter or > >>plug-in they had written that seemed to pull amazing information from > >>images that seems almost obscured by smoke, lack of light, over or under > >>exposure, etc. They were over sharpened, from my perspective, but the > >>coding for the contrast balancing and ability to lift detail out of > >>something that looked like a nearly meaningless image was truly amazing. > >> > >>I don't know if this technology is anything like what ASF came up with, > >>but if it is, its pretty mind-blowing stuff. > >> > >>Art > > > > > >I don't suppose this latest software offering from ASF is that > >sophisticated, though it does seem to work after a fashion, perhaps better > >in some situations than others. I'll play around it some more before making > >a decision on whether to buy or not. > > > >Tris > > > >It should be very good at $50 a pop for a single plug in. >-- >Winsor Crosby
Agreed, the price is steep. I also notice ASF refuses to mention by name other software that accepts their product line, such as Paint Shop Pro. I wonder if Adobe owns a piece of the ASF action or has given money to ASF or otherwise granted that company certain rights in exchange for this mum policy. Anyway, I doubt I'll pop. Just wanted to give what feedback I could for anyone wondering if the demo was even worth downloading. Tris ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
