OK, so the larger images are all single pass (I missed the slide versus image settings on the Vuescan)
In Netscape with my system, the mouse pointer/cursor doesn't show anything. I ended up using properties to read the name of the jpeg file. Anyway, doesn't look like multipass in these cases makes a big difference. Art Jawed Ashraf wrote: > Sounds like you whizzed through too quickly. The top image uses *SLIDE* > scanning in Vuescan, the middle image uses *IMAGE* scanning in Vuescan and > the bottom one is Nikon Scan. > > For the crops the mouse pointer is captioned. Plus, they are described in > more detail in the "How the results are presented" section: > > http://www.cupidity.force9.co.uk/Scanners/LS40/how_the_tests_were_done.htm > > (scroll down to the bottom) > > So, yes, in the three crops, the middle one is multipass. > > Jawed > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich >>Sent: 11 January 2002 03:28 >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: [filmscanners] Re: LS4000 vs IV ED >> >> >>I took a look at the website and the Astia samples. You need to fix the >>titles under the samples, they are either missing (in the cropped images >>once they appear) or in the case of the full images, the top two are >>listed as Vuescan Single pass, and the bottom one as Nikoscan. I >>suspect the middle image is a multipass scan?? >> >>Didn't check the other film types. >> >>Art >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners' or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
