>>I agree the plug-in seems the way to go, assuming the stand-alone software >>has the same feature set. After working a few times with the demo, >though., >>I question somewhat the wisdom of buying it at all. It works after a >>fashion, but not on all material and the results are here and there. Also, >>I'm not sure it's any faster to use the iCorrect filter than the other >>image-correction tools already available to PS or PSP users.
I bought it and I can see why an expert would think this way > >My experience exactly. I tried the demo on a few scans, and the results >were unimpressive. It did a decent job at correcting neutrals, but I can >do that fairly easily using curves. Amen. I'm not a curve man & really like this feature When I tried correcting color casts >in skin tones, the results did not look natural at all. Sometimes. Chasing skin tones can be such a pain that something that hits it straight off a reasonable amount of the time is absolutely a great idea IMHO. I also tried the >"sky" and "foliage" corrections, and the results were not obviously >better, just different. In some of the cases I tried they were HORRID. But for $29.95 ...... :-) IB -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe' in the title or body
