This is a very unpopular point of view, but my thoughts exactly. I try, I upgrade, I mess around for a while finding out what has changed, I lose a scan or two due to overwriting or wrong settings, I do a "perfect" scan and find it is no better than I get from Nikonscan with much less effort and time. I go back to Nikonscan...
Like you I reserve it for an alternative approach in rare cases and sometimes on these occasions it is excellent. I do like Ed's version of ROC that is useful since I don't have it otherwise. Julian At 16:03 22/11/01, Jawed wrote: >So, nowadays I reserve Vuescan for occasional use to give me an alternative >point of view on a "difficult" image. This happens once in, erm, a few >hundred images. I have a shot of the moon which it rescued - terrible >picture but of academic interest. > >I'm disappointed with Vuescan. Sometimes I give my opinion a reality check >(e.g. with an upgrade of Vuescan) but I just can't get results I like. > >I think Vuescan is for the forensic photographers. I like that concept.
