> "Austin Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > How is a randomly sized and shaped dye cloud a useful > characteristic of > > > shape and position? How is it more useful than a precise > position in an > > > array? > > Because it is. It's the way the world works. It IS additional > information, > > plain and simple. Usefulness is a completely different issue, but it is > > ALSO useful, to a point. > > I don't think there's any point in my responding to an argument like this.
That's the point, it isn't an argument! It's like asking why the number 9 is larger than the number 4. It's just the way it is. It's just a fact of simple physics that a pixel does not contain near the same amount of information as a dye cloud.
